Article

Antioxidative Response of Quinoa Exposed to Iso‐Osmotic, Ionic and Non‐Ionic Salt Stress

Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, Wiley, ISSN 0931-2250

Volume 201, 6, 2015

DOI:10.1111/jac.12140, Dimensions: pub.1024888119,

Authors

Amjad, M. (1)
Akhtar, S. S. (2) (3)
Yang, A. (3)

Affiliations

Organisations

  1. (1) Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, grid.440552.2
  2. (2) Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research, grid.484648.2
  3. (3) University of Copenhagen, grid.5254.6, KU
  4. (4) University of Agriculture Faisalabad, grid.413016.1

Countries

Pakistan

Denmark

China

Continents

Asia

Europe

Description

Antioxidants play an important role in adapting plants to abiotic stress by detoxifying reactive oxygen species (ROS). Involvement of antioxidant enzymes in abiotic stress tolerance of highly stress-tolerant quinoa was studied in a climatic chamber at 6 mOsm (milliosmolar) ionic (300 mm NaCl) and non-ionic (600 mm mannitol) salts combined with increasing levels of potassium K1 and K2 (6, 12 mm), respectively. Fifteen days of salt treatment (both ionic and non-ionic) decreased plant growth (shoot and root fresh weight), stomatal conductance and chlorophyll content index. Furthermore, both forms of salt stress increased the activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and peroxidase up to 2.33-, 3.98-, 4.78- and 5.55-folds, respectively, compared to no salt treatment, whereas membrane stability index decreased corresponding to increase in lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde), with salt treatments compared to non-stressed plants. However, no significant effect of potassium and salt treatments has been noticed on the maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII. The results suggested that enhanced antioxidant enzymes activity under salt stress could be one of the factors responsible for abiotic stress tolerance in quinoa.

Research Categories

Main Subject Area

Links & Metrics

NORA University Profiles

University of Copenhagen

Dimensions Citation Indicators

Times Cited: 28

Field Citation Ratio (FCR): 5.57