Article open access publication

Interorganisational Integration: Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators within the Danish Healthcare System

International Journal of Integrated Care, Ubiquity Press, ISSN 1568-4156

Volume 16, 1, 2016

DOI:10.5334/ijic.2449, Dimensions: pub.1052081053, PMC: PMC5015550, PMID: 27616948,



  1. (1) Bispebjerg Hospital, grid.411702.1, Capital Region
  2. (2) Hvidovre Hospital, grid.411905.8, Capital Region






INTRODUCTION: Despite many initiatives to improve coordination of patient pathways and intersectoral cooperation, Danish health care is still fragmented, lacking intra- and interorganisational integration. This study explores barriers to and facilitators of interorganisational integration as perceived by healthcare professionals caring for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease within the Danish healthcare system. METHODS: Seven focus groups were conducted in January through July 2014 with 21 informants from general practice, local healthcare centres and a pulmonary department at a university hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Our results can be grouped into five influencing areas for interorganisational integration: communication/information transfer, committed leadership, patient engagement, the role and competencies of the general practitioner and organisational culture. Proposed solutions to barriers in each area hold the potential to improve care integration as experienced by individuals responsible for supporting and facilitating it. Barriers and facilitators to integrating care relate to clinical, professional, functional and normative integration. Especially, clinical, functional and normative integration seems fundamental to developing integrated care in practice from the perspective of healthcare professionals.

Research Categories

Main Subject Area

Fields of Research

Links & Metrics

NORA University Profiles

University of Copenhagen

Dimensions Citation Indicators

Times Cited: 14

Field Citation Ratio (FCR): 4.69

Relative Citation ratio (RCR): 1.41

Open Access Info

Pure Gold